docs(ngMock): use master installation template #14604
Conversation
The inline installation can't display the proper context. On the website, it shows something like
```
Google CDN e.g. {% code %}"//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/X.Y.Z/"{% endcode %}
```
|
Hm, that's bad. But we cannot use the default installation notes because they will make it look like you should include ngMocks into your application code wheras it should be included in your test runner script. |
|
Oh well. The markup is wrong. I'm not familiar with the syntax. How do I fix it? 😄 |
|
We can either use static version numbers or change how the template is
handled.
|
|
Basically, we want to let nunjucks parse the |
The `@installation` section should be formatted with markdown, not nunjucks template directives. Closes #14604
|
@petebacondarwin, this is still not 100% fixed. Things like |
|
I think that 921f80e fixes these outstanding issues. |
|
So we don't need context to feed the templates but just hardcode the actual file name and versions? |
|
Generally, he installation instructions are automatically generated based on a template (and fed with dynamical values, e.g. package name, file name etc). There are a couple of cases (including |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
docs update
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Other information:
The inline installation can't display the proper context. On the website, it shows something like